

In a Windows world, hardware RAID is big due to the historically abysmal way windows manages disks and redundancy.
#Softraid 5 vs software
In the Linux world, software raid and resilient filesystems lead the pack. Just make sure to tag the post with the flair and give a little background info/context. On Fridays we'll allow posts that don't normally fit in the usual data-hoarding theme, including posts that would usually be removed by rule 4: “No memes or 'look at this '”
#Softraid 5 vs free

Programs that write data which is smaller than the stripe size will not see an improvement from striping, since a single drive within the stripe has to handle such requests.įor example, writing 4K, 8K, 23K of data to a RAID-0 volume that has a 32k stripe size means that the data will just land on one drive- it’s smaller than the stripe size (even if the data straddles two drives, the advantage is small). In most cases, a 32K or 64K stripe size is a good choice (use 64K or larger for SSDs). The stripe size is the size of chunk that each drive in the stripe handles.

RAID-5 vs 3X RAID-0 stripe vs 4X RAID-0 stripe (SoftRAID 5 beta) Stripe size The red/green lower lines are a RAID-5 (striping with parity).

The middle pair of lines is a 3-drive RAID-0 stripe. Shown below, the highest pair of lines is a 4-drive RAID-0 stripe. For example, performance with two drives can be expected to be about twice that of a single drive, for “large” data transfers. ScalingĪ RAID-0 stripe is said to “scale” if the sustained transfer speed for N drives is N times the speed of a single drive. RAID-5 is an attractive alternative to RAID-0 striping, because in essence it is a RAID-0 stripe (with one less drive) along with fault tolerance (capacity of one drive used for parity data). Instead of a mess of 2/3/4 individual volumes, there is one larger and much faster single volume.
